You are reading

Advocates to Rally Saturday for Car Free Plaza

Travers Park “Play In” Flyer (Facebook)

May 10, 2019 By Meghan Sackman

Jackson Heights residents and advocacy groups are rallying tomorrow, for the second time, to ensure that 78th Street, between 34th Street and Northern Boulevard, will be car free as part of the original Travers Park redesign.

The “Save Travers Park ‘Play In’ Community Rally”, to take place Saturday from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the park, will fill 78th Street with children and other residents to show the importance of keeping the street car free, despite the Koeppel Mazda dealership service entrance on the same street.

Advocates, including members of grassroots groups such as Make Queens Safer, Transportation Alternatives, and Jackson Heights Green Alliance, think this service entrance is unnecessary due to the fact that the Toyota dealership, which was there before Koeppel, chose not to put a service entrance there on its own accord.

Advocates for the cause say Northern Boulevard is too dangerous to have cars coming off that road onto a street where they may not expect to stop their vehicle. They say there is a safety issue with children being in such close proximity to these drivers that enter through the service entrance. 

“Drivers coming off Northern Boulevard onto 78th Street are not going to be aware that they have to stop in 100 feet, said Christina Furlong, co-founder of grassroots group Make Queens Safer. “It’s too much of a conflict for the only play space in Jackson Heights.”

Furlong, who attended the first rally for a car free plaza in March where people barricaded the service entrance to block cars, and the town hall meeting where Council Member Dromm reaffirmed his support to the car free street, said the community needs a commitment from the Mayor on this issue.

The original redesign for Travers Park, which has recently completed, included keeping 78th Street completely car free until it hit Northern Boulevard.

A representative from the Mayor’s Office attended the town hall meeting last month and said De Blasio remains in support of the original plans, but Furlong and other advocates for the cause are worried he won’t follow through.

“We need the Mayor’s office to get on board. They made a statement that they need to be held accountable for,” said Furlong. “It’s been a long process of trying to take back green space in the community and after 10 years and soon to be three events taking action, it’s time to get a commitment.”

Queens Fights to Keep their Car-Free Travers Park from STREETFILMS on Vimeo.

 

email the author: news@queenspost.com

3 Comments

Click for Comments 
Rick

They should just put a few speed bumps and a BIG sign that says dead end with red flashing lights .

LET’S GO METS !!!

5
12
Reply
TC on 32.

They should also rally for smoke free gang free park
The vandels already started with the graffiti and the dog owners not pick up after there pets .

27
10
Reply
King Eddy

That massive grass in the middle of the park was bound to be a failure. It actually reduces play area. What’s even worse is that dogs are crapping at night. I don’t walk there unless I have my phone flashlight.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Three sought in armed robbery near Flushing Meadows Corona Park: NYPD

Police from the 110th Precinct in Elmhurst are looking for armed robbers who targeted a 26-year-old woman in Corona and remain at large nearly two weeks later.

Police say three strangers approached the woman as she walked near the Playground for All Children in Flushing Meadows Corona Park at Corona Avenue and Saultell Avenue at around 4:20 a.m. on Friday, July 12. One of the perpetrators allegedly pulled out a small silver revolver and threatened the victim, while the others forcibly removed two yellow gold necklaces worth $2,000, according to the police report; however, an NYPD spokesman said it is not clear if that was the value of both chains or each one individually.