You are reading

Peralta sponsors bill that would put hundreds of speed cameras around city schools

State Sen. Peralta

May 22, 2017 By Jason Cohen

The city will be able to add 610 speed cameras in school zones—in addition to the existing 140–should a bill introduced by state Senator Jose Peralta (Jackson Heights) last Monday become law.

“This bill will save lives and make our streets safer for everyone,” Peralta said in a statement. “Every day, more than one million children, teachers and parents travel to and from school, so we must ensure we deter drivers from speeding to keep everyone safe.”

Peralta and advocates in support of the bill say the pilot program that allowed for the installation of 140 speed cameras approved in 2013 has been successful.

Between 2014 and 2016, there has been a 63 percent decline in speeding violations issued at a school zone camera location.

Additionally, 81 percent of motorists who received a violation for speeding in school areas have not received a second ticket. Injuries to pedestrians, motorists and cyclists have declined by a 13 percent average at locations where cameras are located despite the fact that the cameras are turned off during weekends and nights.

The cameras will be in operation from 6 a.m.to 10 p.m., seven days a week. The use of these speed monitoring devices around city schools is limited to periods surrounding school hours and times of student activities.

Additionally, the bill calls for the implementation of warning signs within 300 feet of a camera, and it would require that a camera cannot be placed within 300 feet of a highway exit. The new legislation would expire on July 1, 2022.

“New Yorkers overwhelmingly support more speed enforcement cameras near schools to reduce traffic fatalities and injuries,” said Paul Steely White, executive director of Transportation Alternatives. “In a citywide poll, 84 percent of all respondents support placing speed enforcement cameras near more city schools than the 140 locations currently allowed under state law.”

Peralta’s bill is being introduced in the assembly by Manhattan Democrat Deborah Glick. It is also being co-sponsored in the Senate by Jeffrey Klein, the leader of the Independent Democratic Conference.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

5 Comments

Click for Comments 
Ted

Cameras are not going to stop people from speeding. Speed bumps will. All those cameras plus labor gonna cost the city a lot of money. Why don’t they spend that money on keeping the damn streets clean. There’s so much litter on the streets because there’s only like three public trash cans every ten blocks.

If a kid doesn’t know how to look before crossing the street, we have a bigger problem.

Reply
Richard

We have a major speeding problem
on 74th street in Jakson Hrs

74th street
Between 37th Ave and 35th Ave
2 schools justg 1 block away

All speed stencils in the 74th street
are all worn out

It’s a SLOW Zone without signs
and road stencils

Danny Dromm has been emailed
repeatedly..
Dromm does Nothing !

We need the road stencils repainted

No action

Why ?

Because it’s not in the Jackson Hrs
Historic District … that’s why.

Somebody
… anybody

Hellllllllllp

Reply
John

Richard must need glasses. The slow zone signs are clearly posted at every entry point in the neighborhood, including 74th Street. Richard also failed to mention that Dromm established the slow zone – which has been implemented inside AND outside of the historic district – in the first place.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City Council passes bill shifting broker fee burden to landlords, sparking backlash from real estate industry and key critics

Nov. 14, 2024 By Ethan Stark-Miller and QNS News Team

The New York City Council passed a landmark bill on Wednesday, aiming to relieve renters of paying hefty broker fees — a cost that will now fall on the party who hires the listing agent. Known as the FARE Act (Fairness in Apartment Rentals), the legislation passed with a veto-proof majority of 42-8, despite opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats.