You are reading

Landmarks tables controversial 37th Avenue plans, but does note that four extra stories is appropriate

Rendering

Rendering

August 4, 2016 By Michael Florio

The Landmarks Preservation Commission once again decided to table a controversial proposal to enlarge a one-story building on 37th Ave.

Developers presented their plan to build four stories of residential units on top of the current one-story commercial building located at 84-11 through 84-23 37th Ave and got a mixed reception from the commission.

This was the second time they presented their plans to the commission only for it to be tabled. The last time they went before the commission was in August 2015.

While the property owner Charles Patel did not get the go-ahead he wanted, the proposal took a big step in the right direction, according to his lawyer, Howard Weiss.

The commissioners noted that the four-story addition was appropriate for the neighborhood, Weiss said. An LPC spokeswoman confirmed this information.

The Commissioners tabled the application, asking the applicant to refine the design further. This includes changes to the brickwork, and other features to make the addition more in harmony with surrounding buildings, Weiss said.

When it was tabled last year, the commission questioned whether it would compatible with the neighborhood. The commission also wanted the developer to do more research on the history of the location.

The applicant spent the last year doing extensive research on the development of Jackson Heights, dating back to the early 1900’s, Weiss said.

With the decision that the four-story addition is appropriate in the neighborhood, Weiss is very confident that once the architectural changes are made, the project will ultimately receive the thumbs up.

“We are happy with their decision,” he said. “We believe if the commission is happy with our changes they will approve the application.”

However, its approval would by contrary to wishes of many residents.

Community Board 3 has rejected the plan several times arguing that it is not appropriate for the neighborhood.

Councilman Daniel Dromm, who spoke out against the proposal at the 2015 hearing, said. “We believe that allowing any additional height on this building violates the original intent of Jackson Heights,” Dromm said.

Dromm believes the LPC shares the same concerns as he does and that Weiss is being very optimistic.

“The commissioners were divided on the height issue, as some thought it did not fit in with the neighborhood,” he said. “One commissioner in particular was concerned that this would set a precedent for the rest of the north side of 37th Ave.”

Dromm said he will continue to attend these public meetings, as well as encourage constituents to write letters to the LPC.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

4 Comments

Click for Comments 
Mary Burkhart

The Landmark Commission should take into account the issue of a third driveway that would be built next to and across from the two existing driveways which are NOW approximately one-plus parking space away from 37th Avenue. One way traffic enters from busy 37th Avenue often at high speed. Does not safety of pedestrians concern the Commission??? Facades while important to the neighborhood are not as important as safety!!!

Reply
nanci paitson johnson

With the subway on Roosevelt and tall buildings on 37th,it will become dark & dreary for a whole lot of people. If they must do this, could they at least squeeze a nice restaurant in there somewhere? Since the closing of The Cavalier there’s been next to nothing in walking distance. Sad.

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City debunks drone reports over LaGuardia after real emergency unfolds in Queens skies

As drone hysteria swept from New Jersey across the Hudson River to New York City on Thursday night, fueled by online reports of nearly a dozen large drones spotted over Queens, a genuine emergency unfolded in the skies above the borough.

The Port Authority and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that a flight out of LaGuardia Airport earlier in the evening was forced to make an emergency landing at JFK Airport after a bird strike blew out an engine on the aircraft.

Op-ed: A new JFK Airport is a doorway to opportunity for local and diverse businesses

Dec. 12, 2024 By Elena Barcenas and Loycent Gordon

As successful small business owners here in Queens, we join all New Yorkers in looking forward to the transformation of JFK International Airport into the world-class airport our city deserves. But a new JFK will serve as more than a global gateway for travelers—for local and minority-owned businesses like ours, it will be a doorway to life-changing opportunities.