You are reading

DOT Unveils Plan for 34th Avenue in Jackson Heights, Includes Pedestrian Plazas and Car Access

Rendering of proposed 34th Avenue street redesign that includes an open street barricade and diverters (DOT)

Oct. 25, 2021 By Max Parrott

The Department of Transportation unveiled its plan for 34th Avenue in Jackson Heights last week and residents learned that the stretch will not be converted into a car-free linear park.

Instead, the agency presented a plan to Community Board 3 on Oct. 21 to turn the 1.3-mile corridor that runs from 69th Street to Junction Boulevard into a series of pedestrian plazas and traffic-restricted zones.

The 34th Avenue stretch has long been regarded as the gold standard of Open Streets, a program that began in 2020 to provide extra outdoor space for residents during COVID-19.

The DOT plans to install four plaza blocks and a series of traffic demarcations along 34th Avenue aimed at slowing down cars and preventing them from traveling more than one block at a time.(click for presentation)

The plaza blocks will be located from 69th to 70th streets by PS 398, from 73rd to 74th streets by IS 230, from 77th to 78th streets by Travers Park and 93rd to 94th streets by PS 149.

DOT plans to install a plaza block by P.S. 398 (DOT)

DOT plans to install a plaza block by IS 230, as well as a shared street block next to it (DOT)

DOT plans to install a plaza block by Travers Park, and a shared street block between 78th and 79th (DOT)

DOT plans to install a plaza block by P.S. 149 and a shared street block between 94th Street and Junction (DOT)

These plazas will take up the street on the northern side of the median, where traffic will be fully blocked off by granite blocks, and bike lanes will be designated with paint.

On the southern side of these plaza blocks, the DOT will create a “shared street” configuration, with traffic markings and curb extensions that will allow vehicles to enter the block for parking, pick-up and drop-off, but restrict their speed.

Plaza Block (DOT)

The overarching 34th Avenue plan is aimed at enhancing the current open street setup, which simply consists of a series of moveable barricades and planters at the entry point to each block.

In addition to the plazas, the plan involves several “shared street” blocks and a system of “diverter” traffic demarcations that will prevent through traffic and make the corridor less reliant on moveable barriers.

DOT urban planner Jessica Cronstein explained that the agency worked with residents and local institutions like schools to come up with a plan.

The agency will install what it calls traffic “diverters” along every intersection of the open street.

The diverters consist of a triangular street demarcation and a granite block that will force cars to turn onto the adjacent north/south streets at the end of each block. The design will still rely on barriers on one side of the street that can be moved so that cars parking or doing deliveries will be able to slowly move through the block.

Street configuration with diverters (DOT)

Diverters (DOT)

“This would be 24 hours a day. It would be all year round. We would be changing the geometry of the street so that through movements along the corridor for vehicles are no longer possible,” said Cronstein.

The DOT says that the design stems from outreach it conducted, with more than 2,000 people surveyed. The DOT reported that 93 percent of the survey respondents were Jackson Heights residents, and nearly a third of the participants listed 34th avenue as the closest intersection to their home.

Cronstein pointed out that it’s an incredibly well-used corridor by pedestrians.

Nearly 50 people signed up to give feedback at Community Board 3 Thursday, with some completely opposed to the open streets concept. Others raised concerns about the implementation of the plan and how it would affect accessibility and traffic on neighboring streets—while others asked questions about whether the proposed traffic restrictions go far enough.

The DOT said that it would take the feedback into consideration as it finalizes the design. Its next step is to coordinate with the MTA, FDNY, NYPD and Sanitation Department for approval, and begin to make the changes in the spring.

Several Open Streets opponents accused the DOT of not listening to the public—and not being open to scrapping the program. Some criticized the DOT’s survey methodology, arguing that it did not accurately reflect the residents who opposed the permanent open streets plan.

“It was not a forgone conclusion,” Cronstein said, who maintained that the extension of the open streets plan reflects the majority of the residents that the agency had heard from.

Some residents had questions about how the diverters would work. Several shared concerns that creating a design where bikes and pedestrians intermingle on the same block would lead to crashes.

The DOT responded that accidents resulting in injuries have gone down under the open street program on 34th Avenue. The number of pedestrian injuries for the three-year average prior to the open street was 11. Now it’s down to seven, Cronstein said.

Dozens of people walking and jogging on 34th Avenue this spring (Photo: Christina Santucci/QueensPost).

A 34th Avenue resident, James Taylor, asked about the DOT’s communication with Access-A-Ride drivers, who, he said, sometimes refused to move the barricades.

The DOT responded that the agency had an accessibility coordinator, who has been working extensively to field complaints from Access-A-Ride passengers on a case-by-case basis.

One resident, who said her children attend school in Sunnyside, asked what impact the changes would have on bus routes. She said that the bus her kids take that goes along 35th Avenue has been arriving late to school.

Cronstein said that the DOT is in the process of reaching out to the Office of Pupil Transportation about the new design’s effects on bus routes and added that the agency will follow up about any problems it’s causing under its current configuration.

email the author: news@queenspost.com

7 Comments

Click for Comments 
Ronald Evitts

The Community Board 3 meeting demonstrated that there is significant opposition to the “Open Streets” project on 34th Avenue. DOT Representatives were hard pressed to respond to the myriad issues, complaints and negative impacts related by the public. DOT wound up resorting to their standard “it’s an overwhelming success” line, as yet unsubstantiated, and representative of the consistent spin and propaganda that has been part of this effort since day one. Suggestions to get a more representative survey or vote to ascertain the actual support level for the project were ignored, with a retort that they had already surveyed 2000 people last year and the response was in favor of the project. This is NOT due process, especially when it is administered by a biased and decreasingly credible advocacy group. The asthma afflicted resident on 35th Avenue, the bicyclist who can’t bicycle on 34th anymore, the 34th avenue residents who are harassed and verbally assaulted by open streeters, trash, noise, etc, are and continue to be issues that must be addressed. And the refusal to have a presentation by professional traffic engineers, of how, where, when and why traffic in the neighborhood is impacted by the closure of 34th Avenue, in favor of having data spun by the communications people at DOT does not bode well.

Reply
Javier

Has anyone figured out how Sanitation will be plowing snow during heavy snowstorms, since those massive trucks and plows won’t be able to drive in a straight line either??

I mean, is walking on a STREET really worth all this money for modifications and upkeep and worth the hardships and safety issues that will arise because of it??

If it ain’t broken…..DONT FIX IT!!

1
2
Reply
Cheryl

What happens to those residents on 34th Ave or the cross streets like 77 and 78 who do not use Access a Ride but rely on Uber or other car services? These drivers either don’t think 34 Ave is open for the turn or refuse to move the barriers. And I can’t tell you how many times I have see people driving the wrong way (on 76 and 78 specifically) from 35 Ave to access their garages so they would not have to spend 15 min going around the block!

2
2
Reply
Juan

I am a resident of the 34th Avenue. I was coming out of my garage and drive slowly, and to turn left at 77th Street, a young man was standing in the middle of the Avenue, I touch my car horn a little bit so let him know “I would like going across” he turn around and start yelling a me. I politely signal him “please move to the side of the street” he refused! and start to moving around and blocking my car. A good neighbor toll him that what was doing was no correct, he turn around and he wants quarrel with him. This open street was set up by our politicians with out consulting the 34th Avenue residents. Those politicians do not living here, and do not even in the neighbor.

2
2
Reply
Phuk Mpilly

What a dumb ass idea. Bikers need to pay to register their bikes and pay tolls and parking since this liberal scum hole is catering to them.

4
4
Reply
Javier

Ok. So will the traffic lights be adjusted for the cross streets and more time added so not just 3 cars can go before the light turns green for the 34th turn and have to wait 5 more minutes before we get it back for 15 seconds?

Because the incessant horn honking has been atrocious.

8
5
Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

Community Impact Award given to organization serving low-income immigrant families in Corona and Jackson Heights

May. 3, 2024 By Ethan Marshall

Literacy Partners, an organization dedicated to enhancing English proficiency among immigrant caregivers to foster greater involvement in their children’s lives, was honored with the Community Impact Award on April 25. This accolade was part of the New York City Service’s Mayoral Service Recognition Program, celebrating significant contributions to the community.