You are reading

Community Forum on Proposed LaGuardia AirTrain to Take Place Tuesday

Proposed AIrTrain route (

Feb. 8, 2019 By Meghan Sackman

A number of local organizations are holding a community forum in East Elmhurst Tuesday to discuss the pros and cons of the proposed LaGuardia AirTrain as the formal process to advance the project is about to begin.

The Federal Aviation Administration is expected to kick off the public review process this spring as it moves toward constructing a 1.5-mile elevated train line that would link the airport to Willets Point—near Citi Field. The Willets Point terminal would then connect to the Long Island Rail Road and the No. 7 train.

The forum, planned for Feb. 12 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the New York LaGuardia Airport Marriott, plans to inform residents as to what the project involves and address concerns dealing with the route, transit system, construction and more.

The panel discussion will be followed by a workshop that will inform locals how to get involved in the public review process.

The project, estimated to cost $1.5 billion, aims to reduce traffic congestion and provide travelers with an alternative means of transportation. Currently, 90 percent of LaGuardia flyers travel by car to get to the airport, according to The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey.

The proposed route would run along the Grand Central Parkway and across the edge of the Citi Field Parking lot. It would not require the acquisition of private property.

Advocates for the AirTrain say the commute from Manhattan to LaGuardia Airport via the proposed route—and LIRR or subway connection– would be approximately 30 minutes.

The public review process will be led by the FAA in collaboration with the Port Authority.

“The FAA expects to begin the LaGuardia Airport Access Improvement Project Environment Impact Statement (EIS) in the spring,” said an FAA spokesperson. “Plans are still being finalized for public meetings.”

The process will start with a “scoping” meeting where the public will get an opportunity to weigh in on what the FAA should study—via a public hearing– when it reviews the proposal.

The FAA will then put together a draft Environmental Impact statement and another public hearing will be held.

The forum, organized by local groups such as Guardians of Flushing Bay, Flushing Chamber of Commerce, and Ditmars Boulevard Block Association, will get attendees up to speed as to how they can be part of the review process.

The Port Authority said that a number of different routes will be looked at as part of the process but that the 1.5-mile is what it deems best. It estimates that between 6.6 million and 10 million trips would be taken on the AirTrain LGA in its early years of operation.

Critics of the current proposal say that the project will lead to overcrowding of the 7 train and the predicted travel time of 30 minutes is too optimistic.

“The goal of the forum is to educate and provide people in opposition to ask questions and connect with people with similar concerns,” John Choe, Executive Director of the Flushing Chamber of Commerce told the Queens Post.

Rebecca Pryor, program coordinator of local groups Guardians of Flushing Bay and River Keeper, said that it’s important for locals to get involved at this early stage.

“The public needs to say ‘this is what needs to be looked at’ and if it’s not reviewed then it’s not a full review. The only way this process is democratic is if people know about it.”

For additional information on the forum, click here

email the author:


Click for Comments 
Alberto Frometa

Unlike the JFK AirTrain which connects with 3 subway lines and almost all LIRR lines, this proposal would only connect with one subway and LIRR line further away from Manhattan than the airport is. A big benefit of LaGuardia people like is that it’s closer to Manhattan than JFK. This proposal makes LGA just as far as JFK.

Also, the 7 train cars (and all numbered lines) are actually built narrower than the lettered lines and thus fit less people. This is because the tunnels they access are built to older standards. The 7 train cannot handle so many travelers with luggage the cars are simply too narrow.


You should make an official comment to the FAA about everything you mentioned. The FAA is reviewing the Port Authority’s proposal and other alternatives before they decide on what will be built to improve transit to LGA. You can make your official comment here –


Hold on: 1.5 billion for 1.5 miles that’s like $15,600 for every inch of train line. Are they gonna make it of pure gold ???


Any development that involves government executives and government union workers will automatically quadruple in price!!!!!!!


Why not extending LIRR service that just goes from midtown to willets point and then directly to LGA? All real cities have trains that go direct city center to airport only here we need to transfer 10 times….


You should mention the problem of having to transfer so much and the point about LIRR access. The FAA is taking public comments as they consider the airtrain plan and look for alternatives that might be better. They’ll have the final say on whether or not the Port Authority will be allowed to build the AirTrain. You can comment here – You should mention this problem in an official comment to the FAA by entering your thoughts into the portal at

JHeights my whole life

Wow that seven train will be overcrowded. Imagine in the late summer when people use it to go to Flushing Meadow Park, Mets games, the U.S. Open and to get to the Airtrain. I hope they run extra trains both local and express. I will start saying goodbye to the seats on the train now, because once the airtrain is up I will probably never be able to get a seat on the 7 again.

JH resident

The 7 train is already overcrowded. The MTA hasn’t realized more and more people are living between Court Square and 74th Street, so they don’t run as many local trains as they should.


Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News