You are reading

City agencies would have to provide ‘photographic evidence’ of violations before issuing summonses if state legislation becomes law

Dec. 16, 2016 By Hannah Wulkan

State Senator Peralta announced today that he will be introducing legislation requiring city agencies to obtain photographic evidence of certain civil violations before issuing summonses.

If passed, the new legislation would require city agencies to develop lists of violations that would require photographic evidence, such as garbage on sidewalks or vermin in restaurants. When issuing a summons, the city agency would need to provide the photos or explain why they were not available.

“This legislation is about fairness, it is about transparency,” Peralta said. “Again, this is another example of how government can catch up to technology. New Yorkers already document everyday life situations with their cell phones or other electronic devices. There is no reason that enforcement officers cannot have proof of a violation by snapping a quick photo with a cell phone or a tablet.”

New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings reviewed more than 700,000 complaints during fiscal year 2016, but 406,914, or 58.1 percent, were dismissed.

New Yorkers served with summonses would still have the right to appeal the violation, Peralta explained, but the photos would provide evidence beyond a simple “he said, she said” debate.

“While justice dictates that respondents should have the ability to ascertain the nature of evidence against them, it is also important that the City is able to prove its case and uphold a summons when it has been properly issued,” Peralta said. “The use of photographic evidence will level the playing field, and allow all parties to accurately address the substance of cases appearing before the OATH tribunals.”

Under the proposed legislation, city agencies would be responsible for establishing their own procedures to collect photographs of violations. Once the photos are submitted with the summons, they will be uploaded to the OATH website so respondents can view the photos when deciding if they want to appeal.

The legislation will be introduced in the assembly by Assemblyman-elect Brian Barnwell, who beat out incumbent Marge Markey in the Democrat primary earlier this year, and then bested his Republican opponent in the election last month.

“I’m proud to sponsor this bill in the Assembly that will grant New Yorkers more transparency from their government.  When individuals receive citations, they should receive photographic evidence detailing their alleged violation.  People will now have the ability to see the evidence alleged against them.  This bill will promote transparency and justice,” Barnwell said.

 

 

email the author: news@queenspost.com

6 Comments

Click for Comments 
Make america strong again, trump will get you

Why do you need evidence. Look at that mess. Does it have to be in 20 different languages too

Reply
Lols

I think this is a great idea for all parties. It’s hard to appeal a Sanitation ticket, as it’s usually your word against the agent even when you as the respondent provide photographic evidence to the contrary.

Reply
Perry

This happens because the people who come here do this in the country they came from its normal to them. Jackson heights turned into a 3rd world country back in the 70s and the politicians just realized this?

Reply

Leave a Comment
Reply to this Comment

All comments are subject to moderation before being posted.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recent News

City Council passes bill shifting broker fee burden to landlords, sparking backlash from real estate industry and key critics

Nov. 14, 2024 By Ethan Stark-Miller and QNS News Team

The New York City Council passed a landmark bill on Wednesday, aiming to relieve renters of paying hefty broker fees — a cost that will now fall on the party who hires the listing agent. Known as the FARE Act (Fairness in Apartment Rentals), the legislation passed with a veto-proof majority of 42-8, despite opposition from Republicans and conservative Democrats.